Interní Med. 2003; 5(8): 394-398

Léčba nemocných se systémovým lupus erythematodes

MUDr. Pavel Horák CSc
III. interní klinika FN a LF UP Olomouc

Keywords: systematic lupus erythematodes, pharmacotherapy, experimental therapy, non pharmacologic management.

Published: December 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Horák P. Léčba nemocných se systémovým lupus erythematodes. Interní Med. 2003;5(8):394-398.

Prognóza nemocných se systémovým lupus erythematodes (SLE) se v posledních dekádách výrazně zlepšila. Přispěla k tomu zejména včasná diagnostika choroby a orgánového postižení, zejména lupus nefritidy a systematická terapie glukokortikoidy a imunosupresními přípravky, zejména cyklofosfamidem. Na druhou stranu existuje mnoho léčebně refrakterních nemocných a široká paleta vedlejších účinků stávajících léků, které spolu podmiňují potřebu vývoje a klinického zkoušení dalších léčiv a nefarmakologických postupů, ještě účinnějších a zejména bezpečnějších než současně aplikované režimy. Článek se soustředí zejména na současné názory na léčbu nemocných se SLE, okrajově shrnuje experimentální terapii odrážející pokrok na poli biotechnologií, která se brzy může stát součástí rutinních postupů.

Management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Prognosis of patients with systematic lupus erythematodes has been improving significantly during last decades. The early diagnosis of this condition and of possible organ damage mainly to kidneys (lupus nephrititis) has contributed tremendously to it, as well as systematic glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy (e. g. cyclophosphamid). On the other hand, there are still some patients refractory to existing treatment, furthermore wide range of side effects of current drugs have been described. That calls for the further development and clinical testing of new drugs and non pharmacologic approaches, more efficient and mainly safe than current applying regimes. The paper concentrates on current trends in management of patients with SLE, experimental therapy is mentioned as well, reflecting progress in the area of biotechnology, which can ultimately become a standard treatment modality.

Download citation

References

  1. Baart de la Faille H. Lupus therapy. Clin Invest 1994; 72: 749-753. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Boletis JN, Ionnidis JP, Boki KA, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin compared with cyclophosphamide for proliferative lupus nephritis. Lancet 1999; 354: 569-570. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Boumpas D, Barez S, Klippel J, et al. Intermittent Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of autoimmune thrompocytopenia in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Int Med 1990; 112: 674-677. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Dostál C, Rovenský J, Lukáč J, et al. Systémový lupus erythematodes. In: Pavelka K, Rovenský J, et al. Klinická revmatologie. Galén Praha 2003: 235-263.
  5. Dostál C, Vencovský J. Léčení SLE. In: Dostál C, Vencovský J, et al. Systémový lupus erythematodes. Medprint Cheb 1997: 196-216.
  6. Esdaile J, et al. The efficacy of antimalarials in systemic lupus erytheamtosus. Lupus 1993; 2: (Suppl 1): S3-S8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Gescuk BD, Davis JC. Novel therapeutic afents for systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002; 14: 515-521. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Horák P, Faltýnek L, Ščudla V. Terapie systémového lupus erythematodes. Zpravodaj klinické farmakologie a farmacie 1996; 10: 20-24.
  9. Klippe JH, Dieppe PA. Rheumatology, Mosby-Year Book Eurolimited. 1994; 8: 284.
  10. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Lan SP, et al. A controlled trial of plasmapheresis therapy during severe lupus nephritis. N England J Med 1992; 326: 1373-1379. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Nossent HC, Koldingsnes W. Long-term efficacy of azathioprine treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 969-974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Perrota S, Locatelli F, La Manna A, et al. Anti CD20 monoclonal antibody (Rituximab) for life- threatening autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. B.J. Haematol; 116: 465-467.
  13. Rose BD, Appel GA. Treatment of resistant lupus nephritis. UpToDate 2003; 11: 4.
  14. Sesso R, Monteiro M, Sato E, et al. A controlled trial of pulse cyclophosphamide versus pulse methylprednisolone in severe lupus nephritis. Lupus 1994; 3: 107-112. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Shur PH. Overview of the therapy and prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus in adults. UpToDate 2003; 11: 7.
  16. Smolen JS. Therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus: a look into the future. Arhtritis Res. 2002; 4 (Suppl 3): S25-S30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Steinberg AD. The therapy of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 1986; 30: 769-774. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Tam LS, Li EK, Leung CB, et al. Long-term treatment of lupus nephritis with cyclosporin A. QJM 1998; 91: 573-578. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Trnavský K. Příručka farmakoterapie revmatických chorob. Grada Avicenum Praha 1994: 106-108.
  20. Vollenhoven R, Engleman E, McGuire J. An open study of dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthr Rheum 1994; 37: 1305-1310. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Internal Medicine for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.